Tag Archives: access

Access to conservation:Greenwich Meantime Plant Nursery

meantime nursery sign

meantime nursery sign

The Meantime Plant Nursery is an innovative volunteer powered project, aiming to put vacant development land to good use growing plants. The Conservation Volunteers are now offering a new volunteering opportunity at the Meantime Plant Nursery:

-learn and develop horticultural skills such as plant propagation and maintenance.
-enhance your DIY and carpentry skills, building new raised beds, irrigating polytunnels and constructing staging.
-discover dendrology with the ‘Remarkable Tree Project’, our new initiative to find and multiply London’s most unusual and unique trees.

Volunteer days are held every Tuesday from 10-3, tea, coffee, biscuits, and all tools, training and equipment will be provided.

I went along to volunteer one Tuesday and found a cheery welcome. We are sorting out how to be most useful to the project. Plans include a suitably high worktable and possibly raised bed.

Michael and Pat

Michael and Pat

The venue has level access and cleared paths with good surfaces for wheelchair users.The site is at the Greenwich Peninsula West Parkside, easily accessed by buses to the Meridian village near the 02 on Jubilee Line (accessible station North Greenwich). It is a good place to relax in a green environment set up in an urban space.

There is a ramp into the office. Unfortunately there is not an usable accessible toilet on the site yet. (But there is an Odeon Imax cinema within a few minutes walk and several restaurants and a B&Q)

IMG_6451

IMG_6438

We are developing a project on accessible conservation and planting project together – watch this space!

IMG_6477

More photos at the flickr page.

Also have a look at this blog on the website which is slightly different from here.

Advertisements

Disabled Access Day in Greenwich 17th Jan 2015

reblogged from Connect Culture website

For the #AccessDay we went to visit Greenwich for the afternoon. We couldnt find much access information and we thought of using the Disability Access Day to visit for ourselves as an afternoon trip.

Reading a report that ‘Access for disabled people on the High Street in Britain is “shocking”, according to a government audit of more than 30,000 shops and restaurants’, we thought we would visit Greenwich to check it out.

According to the Visit Greenwich website, it is ‘ home to a World Heritage Site, Europe’s most successful entertainment arena, Britain’s first urban cable car, London’s oldest Royal Park and the place where hemispheres meet’, but we couldnt really find any information on access for a day trip.

We visited Greenwich Market, looked at some shops and restaurants and ended up with a walk along the river to a pub – The Trafalgar Tavern which disappointingly did not have an accessible loo. Although we are mostly wheelchair users on this trip, we can understand how it would not be easy for people with visual impairments.

So heres a short video of our afternoon in Greenwich. We hope to make a more in depth project of more information on its accessibility in the future.

Get in touch if you re interested!

info@connectculture.co.uk
@connectculture

Wheelchairs versus buggies. The bus wars.

Reblogged from lessons from the warrior’s chair 

for discussion – what do people think? This is a debate that goes on and on and there have been many laments by wheelchair users who ride the bus. Is this really a design issue –should universal design prevail for all types of travellers? there should be space for both buggies and wheelchairs?

In recent, and very unreported news, two conflicting cases on wheelchair access on buses have been sent together to the court of appeal. This is set to become a leading case on public transport issues, and therefore may well be a litmus test case for disability rights in our current system, and under our current ideologies.

The conflict that arises between wheelchairs and other passengers on buses is very symptomatic of the way our society currently operates on issues of equality and access.  It’s one that raises questions about the difference between concepts of ‘equality and diversity’ versus ‘anti-discriminatory practice’ and tells us which one of those is actually more useful. It tells us much about what our society considers the word ‘equality’ to mean, and contrasts that against what it really means to those from minority groups affected by it.

Wheelchair users should have access to buses. It’s a simple no-brainer, one would have thought. The wheelchair accessible bus was invented in 1947 by Walter Harris Callow. This isn’t some strange, newfangled technology. Sadly, however, it is quite new in many places to have actual access to such buses, or such access does not exist at all. Across the EU, a legal directive, known as the ‘Bus and Coach Directive‘ came into force in 2001 mandating that wheelchair users must have access to buses, and that any new buses purchased from then on must not discriminate against wheelchair users in their design. (A mere 54 years after it became possible). In the UK, the disability discrimination act of 1995 had made similar national regulations, but ones that only came into force for any new purchases from 2001 onwards. Routmasters, those ‘traditional’ London buses with several steep steps up to the entrance, remained the dominant type of bus on the London streets until 2005, when they were finally replaced by Ken Livingstone, the encombant mayor. And so, it has only been since 2005 that wheelchairs, or buggies, or shopping trollies, can be taken onto buses.  How quickly a culture adapts to push off the very people the change was predominately made for…

And so, to the present. Not every bus in the UK is yet wheelchair accessible. After all, the law that all new purchases must be compliant is only 14 years old, and a bus can have a life of 20+ years. But we are finally coming to the end of the old physically inaccessible buses, and entering the era of culturally inaccessible ones. From the point of view of the wheelchair user sitting at the bus stop, unable to catch a bus, a much bigger slap in the face in oh so many ways…

The wheelchair user and the bus.

People who use wheelchairs also need to use buses. There is no getting around this. Some may also use trains, trams, and other public transport methods, but buses are the mainstay of our getting around.  In London, the underground network is particularly inaccessible. There are 270 stations on the Transport for London Underground network. Of these, only 66 have step free access. If you use a wheelchair, and want to make a public transport journey, the chances are buses are your only option for any typical route. Similarly, many people who use wheelchairs can drive, and have adapted cars, but many others either don’t own a car, or for complex reasons could never drive. Equally, calling a cheaper hackney cab is not an option for most electric wheelchair users, you can only utilize considerably more expensive Black Cabs – and even so may be routinely charged double the price of a non-wheelchair using member of the public. If a group of people were at a bus stop, and for some reason buses suddenly stopped running that day, but all other transport continued as normal, it is the wheelchair user would would undoubtedly remain stranded at the bus stop, while the vast majority of other passengers would likely be able to find other options available to them.

Buses are important to many people, but have a place of particularly special importance to wheelchair users

Wheelchairs blocked from buses

A wheelchair user wants to get on a bus. There are any number of hurdles in their way. Its not as simple as it may be for other passengers.

The bus needs to be able to stop along a straight pavement with unbroken curb to be able to extend the ramp. In parts of London, this may not be possible. The ramp needs to be working. They don’t always. However, it is people who create the biggest impediment to wheelchair users getting on buses. The wheelchair space is seldom empty, even when the bus itself has almost no passengers on board. It is one of the favorite spaces for any passenger to occupy. People with luggage occupy it. People with shopping occupy it. People with pushchairs, prams and buggies occupy it. People with shopping trollies occupy it. Men in business suits occupy it with a specific masculinity that precludes them from sitting even on an empty bus with no seats occupied. But this toxic masculinity somehow hampers them from moving when a wheelchair user wants to board, and they can try to refuse. The most talked-about divide is created by the parent with the buggy who refuses to move, but like myself, many other wheelchair users I know complain that those with shopping trollies create more stress, and more obstacles than even the parents with buggies.

The view I take is quite straight-forward and hard-nosed. Wheelchair spaces are for wheelchair users. We fought for them. For decades wheelchair users risked arrest and brutality campaigning and chaining themselves to buses for the right to ride. And they didn’t do it because it was fun. They did it, because they needed it to be able to live at all.

A paraplegic woman is removed from in front of a b

Picture: A disabled woman being pulled backwards by 2 police officers , with bus in background. Picture taken 1994. Source: The Guardian

And it was those brave campaigners, back in the days when I and many of my generation of disabled people had no idea yet that it would ever apply to us, that our current rights were won.

No mothers with prams stood shoulder to shoulder with the disabled campaigners. No women with shopping trollies. No men with large suitcases.  They fight against us now. They didn’t even fight for us back then. They had no need. They could already use the bus. Our rights, once won, added fractionally to there convenience, nothing more. In fairness, they were the days I could still walk. And had a small person in a pram. I always folded my buggy at the stop before boarding because I knew no different, and never felt hard done by for it.

It amazes me that so little time as passed, and yet people have managed to totally forget this. In the first mentioned case above, the judge ruled that it is not discrimination to refuse a wheelchair user a space on a bus, because to do so would inconvenience the mother with a child in a pram. But parents with babies  were always able to use buses, prior to the existence of wheelchair spaces.

Stagecoach East Kent

Picture shows entrance to a stagecoach bus with three steps, separating by a pole.  Source: focustransport.

This picture was taken in 2012 in Cantebury, Kent, and the photoblogger comments that when boarding this bus he witnessed 2 mothers with prams being advised to wait for the next bus, as a low floor bus was right behind. Ten years previously, however, all buses on the route would have looked like this, and any parent would have thought nothing of taking their child out of the pram at the stop, folding the buggy and boarding the bus to sit with child in lap. It was only wheelchairs would could not use these kinds of buses at all.

In the intervening time, a cultural shift has occurred. Wheelchair spaces were created for wheelchair users, but despite the large blue wheelchair icon painted on them, and corresponding signage, they are known in the vernacular as ‘buggy spaces’. For a person in a wheelchair attempting to use one, the daily micro-agressions pile up. People sigh. People tut. People stare. People point and comment out loud about how unfair it is that a wheelchair user us taking up the ‘buggy space’.  And all of this will occur with no parent or pram aboard the bus, it is simply peoples perceptions in case someone else wanted to use that space. It gets a bit tough when, day in and day out, just to get to work and back, a hostile crowd must be faced who will openly express opinions on your existence, and see your very presence as a threat to someone else’s ‘rights’.  It gets even tougher when an occasional unreasonable parent is encountered who argues heavily, throws a strop, and storms off the bus into the pouring rain with a helpless freezing child because she is too lazy to fold her buggy, or indeed listen to reason, and her little drama about how her ‘rights’ are being taken away is more important to her than the well-being of her child.

Wheelchair users often need to use more buses, and stay on them for longer, than other passengers, but are also regularly treated as social pariahs, and made to feel like an inconvenience to others that shouldn’t really be allowed to be there, on each and every bus journey.

What is the source of the problem?

People expect to take things on buses now that they would never have thought to take on a bus 15 years ago.  Although no one seemed to feel the loss before it was indeed possible. Other social changes are undoubtedly part of this. People carry huge amounts of shopping, and transport them in shopping trollies. They could not have done with before wheelchair accessible buses were made mainstream. People carry giant unwieldy luggage around with them, and equally could not have done this is previous years. However, for brevity, this blog entry will focus on buggies, as they are central to the current legal appeals.

Meanwhile, people have come to view ‘rights’ in a way that conflates them with ‘wants’, and have lost all concept of anti-discriminatory practice. However, that is a complicated enough concept that I am leaving it for a subsequent blog entry.

While it is therefore far from the only problem, the one focused on here is the conflict over the wheelchair space between buggies and wheelchairs. And it boils down to a numer of issues.

1. Many buggies do not fold.

2. Many others do fold, but not easily, they are large and awkward.

3. On many buses there is nowhere to put a folded buggy.

4. Bus drivers do not know the rules, or refuse to apply them.

5. Passengers are totally unaware of the rules.

This entire blog, so far, has been written from the point of view of the wheelchair user. But its a constructive exercise to shift focus, and look from the point of view of the mother pushing a baby around in a pram, and conceptualize it from her point of view.

Based on so many hundreds of parents I have ended up chatting with while trying to make space and maneuver onto a bus I would start out by pointing out that, in our still very sexist society, the ‘typical’ parent is still most definitely a mother. Fathers do push buggies onto buses, but its a rarity. So we will talk of the Mum.

First of all, she probably hates her buggy. Most mums I end up chatting to start out by apologizing for how long it takes to fold up – from my point of view, I can assure you I really don’t mind how long it takes. If a mum is wiling to fold at all, I think she’s brilliant. Mums tell me that their buggy was bought by the parents-in-law as a gift, as was never the model they would have chosen, sorry its so large and unwieldy, or they say it was second hand from ebay or a neighbor, and never the one they would have chosen. O they say they did buy it new, but no one warned them they might ever have to fold it on a bs, so they didn’t think to compare it to other models.  These Mums are stressed, and hating the big clunky buggies that it is a fight to fold. most of them are wishing for a small umbrella buggy in that moment, but its not totally within their control.

Once the baby is out of the buggy, there is no where to put it. Chances are, on a typical bus, there is one tiny luggage rack, at about chest height. Its too small for a large buggy, and would take considerable strength to swing a large heavy pram frame up there. So, instead of being able to stow the buggy and sit happily with her child on her knee, she ends up standing uncomfortably, with a child on one hip, or precariously on a seat by themselves, and gripping an unbalanced, large clunky piece of equipment threatening to fall and cause havoc at any moment.

By TFL’s own regulations, a bus driver is not allowed to pull away from the stop until both wheelchair, and buggy are safely in position. However, most Mums don’t know this, and fear a jerking, swerving bus skidding down the road as they try to get settled. Some bus drivers also break the rules, putting the lives of the mothers and the children at risk anyway. A mother folding her buggy and settling her child on a seat needs to be given enough reasonable time to do so.

Other passengers are rude as hell. They won’t necessarily offer the mum a seat for herself and her child/ren. They will take the side of the Mum ‘against’ the wheelchair user, throwing evil looks at the wheelchair, and sympathetic smiles at her, as long as they think she is going to do the ‘typical’ thing and get off the bus, and wait for the next one. But heaven help the Mum that folds her buggy and sits with her child. In that moment she may become as much of a social pariah as the wheelchair users. In Victorian times children were allowed to be seen but not heard. In 2014 London buses children are to be neither seen, nor heard, or all social disapproval breaks out. tethered and tied inside a dark black-interiored pram, and silent, a baby is tolerated. Sitting on Mums knee, gurgling and teaching on her fingers, and its a different story. Adults are allowed to shout on their phone, shout at each other, engage in football chants, but any child that makes a noise, even those tiny baby pleasant happy noises that babies sometimes make, and the mother will be inevitably tutted. It demonstrates something very sick about our society. The general mass of passengers on the bus don’t want wheelchairs in the wheelchair space, they want the buggy there instead – because they neither want to see nor hear the children in those prams.

So, what is needed to solve the problem?

Many of the issues outlined are complex. A cultural shift that acknowledges the right of children to be seen and heard on buses would be hard to achieve, but many other simple and straightforward changes could be enacted.

The most obvious two are a change in bus design to allow for more storage space. Not more space for unfolded buggies – that’s never going to be enough. On a bus with one buggy, two will want on, and a bus with 2 biggies, three will want on. Storage space, that allows buggies to fold, and parents to sit with their children would allow ten buggies and a wheelchair user all on the same bus. It used to be totally normal to have  five or six or more parents with babies sin prams before wheelchair buses, and it could still happen easily by having a floor level storage space where folded buggies could be stacked together.

The second, probably easiest to enact, with longest term significant impact, would be:

a requirement for all buggies to be properly labeled at point of sale.

Why would this help?

Many people end up with buggies that are totally unappropriated for use on public transport. Often, that wasn’t their own choice. TFL does actually have rules that a buggy must fold, or it is not allowed on public transport. Actually, they have a bunch of rules that are never applied. For example, if you want to bring a buggy down an underground escalator, by their regulations, you are required to fold it, but no one ever does. A wheelchair user will, inevitably, due to the pressures of the situation, start off by being aware of the TfL regulations, and make equipment choices based on that. I don’t know a single wheelchair user that hasn’t discussed rechecking TfL regulations before committing to a new piece of expensive equipment. Many scooters and some wheelchairs are just not allowed on the bus, and people who use those have the sense to check in advance.

With buggies its not the same, and there are a number of reasons for this. While a bus driver can often see at a glance what a standard, bus legal chair is and what isn’t, its less easy to see at a glance with buggies. Often, I’ve seen a Mum come at me with a what looks like a big, unwieldy contraption, and think ‘why did the bus driver even let her on’ only to watch, amazed, as she swings the baby onto her hip, and with one click and one kick, the buggy collapses into a tiny neat package that is perfectly stable, and doesn’t even need a luggage rack, as it fits easily under a seat. The next journey I see another buggy, which looks small and lightweight, only to have the parent insist it can not fold and doesn’t have a folding mechanism. When I then point out that taking such a buggy on any bus is illegal, so even dismounting and getting on the next, wheelchair free bus is breaking the rules, the parents tend to state at me slack-jawed, disbelieving.

Buggy retailers have much to answer for. Whether you are a grandparent trying to find the most perfect baby carriage for the grandchild you are delighted to welcome to the world but will rarely see because of distance, or if you are the new, harried Mum searching for a bargain in your price range, if all you have ever seen and been told is that any pram at all can go in the ‘buggy space’ then you are not necessarily going to think to ask about the folding mechanism. But the retailers know better. And they know when they are selling models that are going to be hell on public transport, while the slightly cheaper model next to it would actually be far easier.

Food needs to be labeled for suitability. Children’s car seats need to be labeled for safety. Very many products carry regulated labeling systems giving the consumer information before they buy. There is no reason buggies couldn’t be better labeled at point of sale.

such labling could, possibly, have a traffic light system:

Red: a buggy that does not fold, or folds only into a very large heavy unwieldy package that is unfeasible to support on a bus or tube. Not for public transport users.

Orange: a buggy that folds, but may take two hands to fold, may not fit easily into a luggage rack. More challenging to store on a bus. Suitable for occasional public transport users who are willing to put up with some hassle, in order to have other features not relevant to the bus

Green: a buggy that can be folded quickly and easily with one hand, is lightweight and stows away easily or takes up little room and sit son a stable base when folded so that the parent can forget about it, and sit with their child on tier knee for the journey.

What would such a labeling system achieve? For all newly purchased buggies, a parent would be asked to think for a few minutes while making the purchase as to the suitability of the equipment they were buying. If a parent bought a pushchair that was unsuitable for public transport, they would know that they were doing so. And it becomes easier to get tough and deny access, as there is no pretense left. The buggy pusher knows they are making a consumer choice to own that particular model. Its not discrimination to refuse them the wheelchair space, or blocking the gangway with their buggy, as they an everyone else can accept that they are making a consumer choice, and unlike the wheelchair user, have plenty of other options available to them, so everyone can sit in comfort on the bus together.

It would benefit wheelchair users. It would benefit buggy users. It would benefit everyone. And help end the wheelchair versus buggy wars on buses.

Connect Culture members visit ‘I need a Holiday Too’

at the water edge

reblogged from Connect Culture website

We decided to visit Brittany after hearing all about I need a holiday too. They had kindly offered a top prize to the Moving On Young Disabled Students video competition.

None of us drive and Jacqui and Carl agreed to hire a mini van for us to drive us around. We took Brittany Ferry crossing over from Portsmouth International Ferry Port & Terminal

Tip for wheelchair users using public transport – taxis in Portsmouth use telescopic ramps (with 2 planks/ramps – I hate those) which I find scary! Better to take the local bus no 700 or 20.

We had booked accessible cabins but they are on the small side! They do come with en suite bathrooms and television.

 

It was cocktails on board – there was a mixture of family entertainment by a magician and comedian. But we were all tired and the gentle rocking of the boat made sure we slept through the night.

The wait to get off the boat the next day was looong! We had to wait for the right ramp and the accessible van.

Carl came to pick us up at St Malo. We stopped at a supermarket to pick up supplies: fruit, vegetables, eggs, wine, cheese, charcuterie, fish, yoghurts and brioche! When we arrived at the house, we sorted our rooms and rested, and had a quiet but delicious meal!

We went off to a stroll around La Roche Derrien following the river right next to the house.

The next few days we went out to visit different beaches in the near vicinity – they were all very different and had some splendid meals in restaurants some of which were recommended by Jacqui.

 

and of course the whole trip was made stress free because Jacqui and Carl were very accomodating and had the equipment needed for us (even a ‘hospital’ bed for me)sked Jacqui I asked her why she thinks people should want to visit her –

It was time for us to leave and on the ferry we were happy to know we could access the deck

Here is Carl saying goodbye to us before we set off home

Carl

Thank you Jacqui and Carl for a great restful holiday!

 

Photos of work started at Coventry rail station

Pedestrains and wheelchair users take care because previous crossing where taxi rank is now blocked off

crossing for pedestrian is blocked off

crossing for pedestrians is blocked off

To get back onto pavement to station entrance can only be accessed through cobbles onto curb cut for the cordoned bus waiting area. This is ironical because they filled up the potholes for a few days before it was all dug up again!

Previous taxi rank is blocked off

Previous taxi rank is blocked off

Not sure how the car park is accessed either.

We will be adding more photos later.

Washington DC: tech@lead museum accessibility and access in the city!

street with zebra crossing

Crossing the street on the National Mall in Washington DC

I was lucky enough to be invited (as from Connect Culture)  to Tech@Lead, ‘a pilot event that will bring together diverse experts and practitioners from a variety of fields, including the arts, education, design, exhibition, media, electronic and information technology, online experiences and mobile and portable device development and manufacture – all to advance the development and application of innovative technologies that support the inclusion of people with disabilities in the cultural life of our world.’ It was held at the Kennedy Center in collaboration with the Carl and Ruth Shapiro National Center for Accessible Media at WGBH and the Smithsonian Institution.

The conference was amazing and energising in having so many leading people in the fields of design, art, technology, museums, and gaming who created a focused conversation at how we can work together to make art of all forms accessible to the disabled community. People like Sina Bahram whom I found effervesent in his enthusiam for technological solutions, Nancy Proctor an inspiration from the Smithsonian and Museums and the Web, Halsey Burgund who excited me with his audio art and many others. I tried Google Glass and ByteLight and thought I saw a glimpse into the future.

Sina Bahram and neal Stimler demonstrating Google Glass

Sina Bahram and Neal Stimler demonstrating Google Glass

Thanks to Nancy I was also invited to the Smithsonian event the next day. As the Americans say – it was awesome! I was able to talk about the paper we contributed in the July 2013 special issue on accessibility of Curator Journal. These discussions gave me new ideas and inspiration for the Moving On Accessible Transport event we ‘re holding in November at the Coventry Transport Museum. It’s turning to be an international event because Scott Rains   (world traveller and universal design evangelist) will be able to join us and Christiane Link who will be speaking about German transport.

The tech@lead conference was only for the day but I stayed for longer than that to give myself a chance to get over the jet lag which I knew would hit me from previous experience. But here, I would like to talk a bit about the access in Washington DC – to give an idea to others who would like to visit or who will be visiting the city.

First of all, I stayed at 2 different hotels – both at Foggy Bottom, the George Washington University Inn and the Melrose. The GWU Inn is a boutique hotel, I loved the townhouses in this neighbourhood.  The accessible entrance is at the back and the room is comfortable (with 2 double beds!) and it even has its own coffee maker, microwave and fridge. The bathroom was spacious however, the toilet is very low and it is a bath and not a roll in shower. They do provide a bathseat which I found sturdy and I didnt have any problems transferring. (Would be much better with a helper). If I had any complaints it would be that each light and lamp need to be individually switched off, there was no central switch – which can be problematic if you cannot quite reach the appliances in question. I found the staff attentive and helpful (especially a woman named Vanessa).  It was also useful that they had a nice cosy restaurant on the premises.

I had to switch hotels because there were no accessible room available for me after the weekend. The Melrose was about 5 minutes away. Its a much bigger hotel and to get to the lifts, there was a platform lift . However obliging the staff were, there were quite a few times I had to wait for them to clear the trolley out to work it for me. I really like the shower room though. It was cosy and felt ‘safe’. However, I think the bathroom floor had a slippery surface.

If I were to complain it was that staff were less attentive – an engineer which was supposed to come did not turn up – my television did not work properly. (and there was only children’s HBO anyway so maybe it was not such a great loss). However lights flashed when the doorbell rang – so I would have been alerted if I was deaf. There was no microwave. I found both Trader Joe and Wholefood Supermarket close by – so a microwave would have been handy.

Foggy Bottom Metro station

Foggy Bottom Metro station

(to be continued)

Access at the City of Coventry Arena: Olympics Bronze medal women’s football and finishing off the tour by visiting the new Changing Places toilet in Coventry

It might be a bit late to report on the access of going to the City of Coventry (Ricoh ) Arena for a football game. We understood that the access getting onto the stadium might be a little different due to security measures as an Olympics game. LOCOG was dealing with the whole event. But we were there for the Women’s Bronze Medal Football match, France vs Canada, on the 9th August.

Getting to the stadium was smooth – volunteers were friendly, happily smiling at us, very patiently greeting everyone. We got on on the provided asccessible shuttle vans from the rail station with no trouble, our wheelchairs suitably bolted on and we all had with our seatbelts on.

wheelchair assistance

photo provided by Sarah Rennie

Getting into the stadium was not so smooth. We were dropped off at the accessible car park and there was quite a long track to our gates but there was at least one seriously steep ramp to negotiate which made me fear and cling on fast to my chair. I had to negotiate the ramp backwards and my power chair needed steadying by a volunteer. We were told it was a temporary measure and some contradictory statements by different people/supervisers saying that there was another route but nobody seemed to know. We saw other people with mobility issues struggling as well. It seems a shame that the whole access issue was not better managed. It made me feel obliged to return to watch a ‘ normal’ game just to gauge the access.

Once we were in the stadium we had great seats and enjoyed the spectacle immensely. The Canadian team won.

I persuaded my out of town companions to visit Coventry city centre and have a drink at the Global market in the new Broadgate square and ended up at the library to show off our brand new Changing Places toilet.  It was pronounced to be just what it should be and got the seal of approval from Sarah Rennie.